Canned Revolution

ufo gallery | jfk conspiracy | faking the moon | | evapozoology | sublies link |
case 1: safe as milk | case 2: tiki terror | case 3: when harry met mibs | who are the mibs? | spot the mib | subsecrets link | subsecrets link
the invasion of iraq | the war on terror™ | subwar link | subwar link | subwar link | subwar link | subwar link
canned cinema | army of 1.6 a day | private lynched – patriot | the mass mediocre | subpropaganda link
forums | take our quiz | date the second shooter | win a t-shirt | spot the mib | movies | election 2004 | adbusting
mommy, what’s a canned revolution? | the machine | short history of manipulation | submanifesto link | submanifesto link | submanifesto link | submanifesto link
buy shirts | downloads | shirts | subconsume link | subconsume link | subconsume link | subconsume link | subconsume link

Inside ‘liberated’ Iraq

Panic button!

Life’s so much better now that the Americans have brought freedom to the country, right?

The mainstream media continues to refer to Iraq with the description ‘liberated’ without any sense of irony. Is the lot of the average Iraqi better now than it was? No. Will the nation’s wealth and infrastructure return to pre-sanction levels anytime this decade? No. Still, at least Baghdad remains on the international radar which is more than can be said for the black hole that is Afghanistan where reports are few and far between and international reconstruction has been one tenth of what was originally promised.

 

Rebellion against the occupying forces is hardly surprising. The number of untruths thrust upon the nation has become intolerable. Aside from the actual reasons for war in the first place, which everyone now just accepts were warped without demanding any kind of retribution to Messers Bush, Blair and Howard, since Saddam was deposed the national rebuilding has been farcical — corporate rebranding and profiteering more like. Iraqis have watched as the job of rebuilding the nation has not gone to them but to cronies of the White House who are given sweetheart contracts to remould the country according to the whims of the Bush administration.

 

Won the battle, lost the war

The set of lies that initiated the war on Iraq included the promise of installing democracy. This has proved to be yet another terminological inexactitude as the war spins more and more out of the US’ control. It is fair to say that the ‘Coalition’ had already lost this war way back in May 2003 when Dubya choreographed his victory speech onboard an aircraft carrier. Ousting Saddam was one thing: getting Iraqis to accept an occuptation force of infidels in the birthplace of civilisation quite another.

Iraq had been hard hit by 13 years of US-led sanctions which resulted in as many as 500,000 dieing. The US and the UK, imposing a no fly zone, routinely blew up supposed military installations but were apt to make mistakes.

The state of the nation on the eve of war was thus decrepit with many naturally hostile to the British and Americans for the hardship they had wreaked upon the country.

Once Bush and Co had rumbled into Baghdad and set up the Coalition Provisional Authority much of the country’s infrastructure and utilities lay in ruin, taken out by tactical strikes with little thought for the livelihood of the average citizen.

Indeed, a glance at what remained of the government buildings is telling. Just the Planning Ministry with its handy intelligence files and the Oil Ministry were protected.

Despite victory being declared the bullets continued to fly with hundreds of innocent citizens on the receiving end of American GI ignorance, firepower and brutality. Freedom was not shaping up well. Any sign of demonstration was greeted with a hail of bullets.

More >>>

Perhaps Junior should have listened to dad.. Well spotted by Iraq Body Count for this pertinent quote from TIME Magazine March 2, 1998:
"Extending the war into Iraq would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Exceeding the U.N.’s mandate would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the U.S. could still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land."
An excerpt from Why We Didn’t Remove Saddam by George Bush Sr and Brent Scowcroft.

Echoes of the past“Our armies do not come in your cities and lands as conquerors or enemies, but as liberators… I am commanded to invite you to participate in the management of your own civil affairs.”
British general Stanley Maude, on conquering Iraq in 1917.
Set up as a protectorate, the idea of independence was soon quashed by the then world’s largest empire. A rebellion was put down, using among other military things, poison gas, killing as many as 10,000 Iraqis.
A Saudi Arabian was anointed king and the minority Sunnis ran the country. Only after 40 years did the British lose influence in Iraq and even then the Americans were able to bolster the Ba’ath Party to power,  ensuring the West retained sway over the nation.


 

 About Us | Site Map | Contact Us | ©2004-2007 Canned Revolution